I was poking around Solana Pay last week and got curious. Whoa! The first thing that hit me was how fluid the payment rails feel compared with other chains I’ve used. At first it seemed like just another payments layer, but after testing swap routing and seeing NFTs used as receipts, my take shifted. Here’s the thing: speed and composability together change what you can build for retail and creators.

Seriously? The UX is oddly pleasant. Developer docs are terse but actionable, and that matters when you’re iterating fast. Initially I thought integrating swaps into checkout would be a kludge. Actually, wait—let me rephrase that: I expected fragmentation to wreck the flow, though in practice the swap routing on Solana is surprisingly coherent.

Okay, so check this out—merchant A can accept a token, route a portion to cover fees, and automatically mint an NFT receipt for the buyer, all in one loosely-coupled flow. Hmm… my instinct said that bundling swaps and NFT issuance would add latency, but the latency stayed low. On one hand this opens neat retail micro-payments; on the other hand the whole dependency on on-chain programs means you better design for retries and edge cases.

I’ll be honest: I’m biased toward tools that keep the user in a single flow. This part bugs me about many multi-chain demos—too many hops, too much context switching. Phantom has been my go-to for a while because it balances ease-of-use with enough advanced features to feel like a proper crypto wallet rather than a novelty. For folks building on Solana, the phantom wallet remains one of the simplest on-ramps for users who want to interact with Pay, swaps, and NFTs without getting lost.

How swaps change the checkout story

At the core, swaps let you accept one token and settle in another. Whoa! That small idea is huge for merchants who want stable-value receipts but also want to tap into token liquidity. Medium-size merchants can accept SOL or a token like USDC, route via DEXs to the desired settlement token, and still avoid massive slippage if they choose good pools. Long story short, routing matters: the better your aggregator logic, the less friction the user feels, though actually implementing that routing requires decisions about trade-offs between gas, front-running, and slippage tolerance.

Tip: design your UX to show a simple preview of the swap result. Seriously? Users hate surprises at checkout. Show pre-fees, show price impact, and allow a one-tap acceptance. That transparency reduces chargebacks and customer support tickets. It’s basic product design, but when you mix in on-chain settlement, you get edge cases—failed trades, partial fills, and the occasional network congestion hiccup—so show fallback instructions in the UI.

On the developer side, composability is the killer feature. You can stitch a swap, a transfer, and an NFT mint into a single user journey using program-derived addresses and cross-program invocations. My gut feeling when I first read about CPIs was skepticism—seemed like needless complexity—but then I built a prototype and was like, okay this is actually powerful. You do need good error handling though. Somethin’ as small as a missing account can blow up the whole flow, and the UX should gracefully surface that.

NFTs as receipts, loyalty badges, and community hooks

NFTs used to be all about art and speculation. Now they’re becoming pragmatic UX elements. Hmm… a receipt that doubles as a loyalty token makes returns and rewards a lot easier to manage because ownership is clear and composable. Medium-level creators can issue limited-edition NFTs at checkout, which both records the transaction and adds collectible value—careful: you don’t want to spam buyers with tokens they’d rather not hold.

Here’s the thing: when you combine Pay’s fast settlement with a wallet that supports seamless NFT display and management, you get a user experience that non-crypto-native customers can stomach. My instinct said onboarding would be the blocker. On the contrary, when the wallet handles metadata, image hosting references (or offloads via Arweave/IPFS), and token grouping, it lowers friction a lot. Though actually implementing a sane metadata workflow is fiddly and often under-documented.

Practical example—concert merch. A fan buys a tee; the merchant issues an NFT ticket that unlocks exclusive content later. The swap feature lets the fan pay in whatever token they hold, the merchant settles in USDC, and the NFT captures provenance for future perks. On one hand that’s a killer loyalty loop; on the other, it breeds complexity in customer support, so plan for non-blockchain fallback redemption methods.

Wallets matter: why choice of wallet shapes adoption

Wallet UX kills or makes your product. Whoa! People will abandon flows if signing is clumsy or if the wallet asks for too many unfamiliar permissions. Phantom strikes a balance: it’s close to consumer-level simplicity but still exposes enough hooks for devs to automate parts of a flow. The less the user has to think about tokens, the better.

I’ll be blunt—if your integration requires users to manually manage token accounts, you’ve already lost half your conversions. Long-term, wallet abstraction layers and SDKs that hide token account complexity will win more mainstream users. I’m not 100% sure how fast that will happen, but momentum is in that direction. Meanwhile, integrate with wallets that prioritize UX and offer predictable signing patterns.

Also: think about cross-device recovery and education. Users expect that if they lose their phone they can recover easily. Provide clear on-boarding steps, recovery tips, and a minimal explanation of what a swap does during checkout. Little things like a one-line: “you’ll pay X, we’ll settle Y” remove a lot of doubt.

Alisson Nunes

More Posts